This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and analyse use of our website. By clicking ‘I accept’ you agree and consent to our use of cookies. You can find out more about our cookies here. Find out more

3% higher rates & replacement main residence relief

SDLT-couple-moving.jpg
Does the 3% higher SDLT rate apply to your clients?

Paul and Fiona own a flat in Scotland, which for many years was their only main residence. They decided to relocate to London in 2010 and have been renting property there ever since; during which period the Scottish property has been rented out. The couple also own a holiday home in Spain.

Paul and Fiona now want to relocate to Northern Ireland and purchase a property there. They intend to sell their flat in Scotland, but this is unlikely to be agreed before the purchase of the Northern Ireland property.

Over a few beers in the pub, Paul was advised that if he and Fiona sell their Scottish property within 3 years of buying the new property they would be able to claim a refund for the 3% higher rates paid at the time of purchasing the Northern Ireland property.

Considerations:

  • Paul is correct that there is an exemption to the 3% surcharge if the new property acquisition is or becomes a replacement main residence.
  • If it becomes a replacement main residence, a refund can be claimed in respect of the additional SDLT paid at the date of the purchase of the new property.
  • If there is a replacement of a main residence, then the 3% surcharge will not apply, even if they retain their holiday home in Spain.
  • The Northern Ireland property will become a replacement main residence if:
    • ­ It is intended to be Paul and Fiona’s main residence; and
    • ­ In the 3 years following this purchase, Paul and Fiona dispose of another dwelling; and
    • ­ The old property being disposed of must have been occupied as Paul and Fiona’s main residence in the 3 years before purchasing the Northern Ireland property.

The verdict:

Paul and Fiona have not lived in the Scottish property since 2010 and therefore the 3-year occupation requirement will not have been met.

Accordingly, Paul and Fiona will be subject to the 3% surcharge on the purchase of the Northern Ireland property and will not be eligible to claim a refund, even if their Scottish property is sold within 3 years.

Perversely, if the Scottish property is sold before the purchase of the Northern Ireland property, the 3% surcharge would not be payable under the grand-fathering provisions (see case study 2).

If you have any queries around SDLT please do not hesitate to get in contact via our SDLT Advisory Service.

Return to case studies